This guide references text and resources from the following, extremely informative Library Guides. All are excellent resources to visit when conducting a review:
Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., & Cummings, G. G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x
Brownson, R.C. Fielding, J.E., & Maylahn, C.M. (2009). Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health Practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 175-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J, & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Bmj, 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Waters, E., Hall, B. J., Armstrong, R., Doyle, J., Pettman, T. L., & de Silva-Sanigorski, A. (2011). Essential components of public health evidence reviews: capturing intervention complexity, implementation, economics and equity. Journal of Public Health, 33(3), 462-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr064
Chapter 21 of the Cochrane Handbook For Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019) covers working with qualitative information.
Copyright @ The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.